• Home

A Letter To The Times

"I shall write a letter to the Times!"

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Trust: A Sign of the Times
Proper English is a crime »

How to deal with the new medical care system

March 23, 2010 by Cassandra Goldman

There comes a point when every traditionalist moves from searching for remnants of a moral and constitutional order to conserve and begins instead to long for the collapse of the current system.

~Farewell, America

Since I was a teenager, I’ve been saying that I hoped that the first President who was not a male WASP would be a good one, as a bad one would likely cause a resurgence of racism. Now we are being given the opportunity to find out if the predictions of the sixteen-year-old Cassandra Goldman were correct, as we have a mulatto president who is both inept and corrupt. Will the ideal of racial equality survive?

I doubt it, because I don’t think much is going to survive. I suppose I can hope that we’ll produce as much good music as the Weimar Republic over the next few years, since we’ll probably have the rest of their predicament. The system was already tottering, and Hussein Obama didn’t have the discernment to see that giving it a good firm push was not a good idea. As I’ve said before, a wise parasite does not kill its host. Liberals are not wise parasites.

However, this gives me an excuse to post about a subject I’ve been wanting to discuss for a while: health. Our medical system is now inevitably doomed to a steady decline. Soon, mothers of my faith will stop urging their sons to go to medical school.

To escape the fate of waiting in line while our bodies suffer irreversible damage or appearing before a death panel to learn if we have been deemed worthy of being allowed to live, we are going to have to take responsibility for our own health. It shouldn’t be too difficult; we’ve already been made responsible for everyone else’s.

Since I had a health crisis some years back, I’ve been studying the subject for myself. It had become too clear that I couldn’t rely on my doctor to look after it all for me, or tell me everything I needed to know. Furthermore, as on so many subjects, the beliefs on health that have been impressed upon us all of our lives could not be more wrong. Bear in mind that this is only what I have learned for myself by reading piles of books. I am not a medical professional of any sort, just someone who wanted to learn. You will have to do your own research and use your own brain.

To begin with, we are going to have to break free of all the lies we have been told about nutrition in recent decades. We all know that most of the health problems that plague us could be corrected with better habits in eating and exercise. I’m just going to list a few of the myths, then a few books that back me up.

LIES:
* Whole grains are good for you.
* Carbohydrates are good for you.
* All that matters is how many calories a food has.
* Cholesterol is basically Satan incarnate, which is why you should never eat eggs.
* Red meat is unhealthy and you should seldom eat it.
* Chicken is healthier than steak, but be sure to throw away the skin!
* Dietary fat causes people to be fat. Thank goodness that nowadays, we have figured out ways of making low-fat milk, low-fat cheese, low-fat cream, lean pork, and low-fat margarine without any of that yucky milk in it. How on earth did our ancestors survive without these things?
* Running long distances is good for you.
* Foods like meat, dairy products, olive oil and so on are full of things that are bad for you. You’re better off drinking a can of chemicals known as a “diet shake”.
* Caffeine is harmless. Even for small children.
* Most Americans get too much protein. After all, Dr. Atkins died of a heart attack.

Now for the books I recommend. For a detailed survey of the “science” behind the lies above, read Good Calories, Bad Calories: Fats, Carbs, and the Controversial Science of Diet and Health by Gary Taubes. By the time you are finished, you will be amazed that anyone ever had the gall to claim there was evidence for the nonsense above, and will already be on board for In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto by Michael Pollan. And you’ll be ripe to be infuriated by Greg Critser’s Fat Land: How Americans Became the Fattest People in the World, which explains how our government helped to inflict high-fructose corn syrup on us.

EDIT: I had never actually read Fat Land, only the reviews on Amazon. Now the author, in a comment to this post, has revealed that he wishes for people he dislikes, a category which includes this blogger and presumably her readers, to be raped and murdered. What we have done to deserve such a fate he does not mention. The same information can be found in more compact form without giving money to someone who wants us dead here. /EDIT

For advice about what you should eat, read any book with the words “French paradox” in the title or subtitle. The so-called “French paradox” is that French people do none of this, they drink wine and eat fatty foods and drink coffee and smoke and their rates of obesity and cancer are far lower than ours. The various books all say pretty much the same thing: eat food, not chemicals. Nature knows what she’s doing.

The single nutrition book I would recommend above all others is The Diet Cure by Julia Ross. Or maybe her other book, The Mood Cure. The two have substantially the same message, but if you have a mood disorder such as depression, buy the latter. Ross prescribes a slew of vitamins and supplements according to your body’s needs.

If you have a large amount of weight to lose, read a few books on low-carb diets. They are the only ones which work. Pick one which suits you – Atkins, Paleothin, South Beach, etc. Thanks to the prevalent misinformation I’ve listed above, this can be a tough row to hoe, but if you’re reading my blog, you’re probably enough of a contrarian to eat low-carb.

It’s interesting that on the very day I needed to discuss this, I came across a blog post about low-carb diets treating cancer. There is reason for skepticism about blaming cigarettes for cancer. A few decades ago, a lot more people smoked. I remember my mother smoking in a grocery store. People lit up in movie theaters. In old movies you can see people smoking in the corridors of hospitals – check out Wings of Eagles. There is a delightful scene in The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse (Edward G. Robinson, 1938) in which a patient lying on a table, waiting to be operated on demands a cigarette while he waits for the surgeon to scrub up. I have read speculation that since that time, cigarette companies have begun adding a great many synthetic chemicals to their tobacco and that this is the real danger, but I haven’t been able to find solid verification of this. However, I think that, whatever the effect of the chemicals, it is probably true that more of them are used than was the case a few decades ago, because people old enough to remember that era have said that the strong, unpleasant smell now associated with smoking venues never seemed to arise.


Source.

According to this chart, lung cancer rates peaked just at the time when the anti-smoking hysteria was really taking off, and today is higher than it was when almost all adults smoked and could do so everywhere. Seems you’d be better off giving up sugar than tobacco.

I am not a “natural medicine” fanatic, but with what the government is preparing to do to allopathic medicine, it is only sensible to study natural remedies. If the government decides that a subversive reactionary like you should, as Garrisson Keillor recommended, be denied any medical care beyond aspirin and hand sanitizer, you need to know what vitamins and herbs can help your conditions. If you have a yard, it wouldn’t be a bad idea to grow the herbs yourself. But don’t be surprised if eventually that gets outlawed.

It seems unlikely that alternative practitioners will be under the same stranglehold as allopathic doctors. My own conviction is that we need both, but if allopathic medicine is put beyond your reach by the government, find a good acupuncturist. (If possible, I recommend finding one who is actually from China.) Also, find a chiropractor whose practice has the words “atlas orthogonal” in its name.

Allegedly, scientists have “proven” that acupuncture is a placebo. I don’t think so, for the simple reason that I have used it and it worked. Similarly, I keep hearing that chiropractors can’t help with anything other than lower back pain. I can only conclude that whatever study determined this had flawed methodology, because after months of mostly useless efforts on the part of my gastroenterologist, it was my chiropractor who finally persuaded my severe gastritis to quiet down. The last time I had a flareup, I felt as if my stomach were on fire. I took a bunch of pills, including prescription medications, and they did nothing. Then I got in the car and went to my chiropractor, and twenty minutes after he started messing with my bones, my stomach was normal and painless again. It’s a tough sell to convince someone that the sky is green when they’ve actually seen it.

I still have some unhealthy habits, even though I know better. It’s a scanty silver lining, but the fact is that responsible people are going to improve their eating and exercise habits now that American medicine is going to be destroyed.

I feel somewhat presumptuous, offering this data when I know how far I am from being an expert. Consider this merely a starting point, to save you too many years struggling to abide by the myths listed above before stumbling across the facts on your own.

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Uncategorized | 16 Comments

16 Responses

  1. on March 23, 2010 at 10:28 am greg critser

    I think you are perfect scum and the only thing that might help you is if you mated with a “mulatto.”
    Please die an early death.


  2. on March 23, 2010 at 4:19 pm Hawaiian Libertarian

    Cass – amen. I’ve done my own research into all of this, have applied the same principles to my diet, and have seen a dramatic improvement in my health and well being (not to mention the initial weight loss). I wrote two posts regarding the research I did about the lies that have become conventional wisdom.

    The Source of Dietary Deception

    “A Plant Based Diet”

    Greg – Learning the truth about nutrition and diet and the lies promulgated by the big agricultural corporate/government complex means Cassandra will most likely avoid the early death you wish for her, you useful idiot choad.


    • on March 23, 2010 at 9:13 pm cassandragoldman

      HL, thank you very much for the links – and for the chivalrous defense!


  3. on March 23, 2010 at 6:16 pm SimonPure

    Honestly, anyone who uses “liberal” as a term of opprobrium is not thinking clearly (if at all).

    And, on how many points do you seriously disagree with conservative political opinion? If the answer is few, then are you thinking for yourself, or just adopting a collection of ideas en masse?


  4. on March 23, 2010 at 9:36 pm David Brown

    Cassandra,

    My experience parallels yours. Lots of random research over more than three decades was helpful but I still got blindsided by omega-6. My downfall was peanut butter. I consumed it almost daily for more than three decades never suspecting I was loading my tissues with omega-6 HUFA (highly unsaturated fatty acids.)

    I encourage you to investigate the omega-6 hazard. Just Google “Omega-6: Friend or Foe” or “David Brown omega-6.” There’s not a whole lot of interest in omega-6. I recently examined 5 years of back issues of Consumer Reports on Health to see what that organization had to say about omega-6. Omega-3 was mentioned frequently in articles about dietary fat but there was no mention of omega-6.


    • on March 23, 2010 at 10:39 pm cassandragoldman

      Thank you! I actually have heard about them, but only in passing. I appreciate this. I believe I’ll make a followup post in a few days with a link to your blog. Hopefully we can raise awareness about this a little.


      • on March 24, 2010 at 7:30 am GM Palmer

        David & Cassandra–Omega 6/3 provides a quick and interesting read on Wikipedia–and demonstrates why we have so many problems (grain-fed beef & chicken & eggs contributing mightily to our woes).

        It heartens me that my family & I eat all free-range eggs (from our own chickens) and chicken and grass-fed beef. Of course that means that we only buy our meat in bulk three times a year from a farm in Tennessee, but OTOH we’re not eating nearly as much poison as the average bear.

        I asked Mr. Crister for an apology over on his blog. I’m sure he was upset by your use of “mulatto,” Cassandra. Perhaps he would have been happier with “of mixed race” or some more politically correct term. Of course, “mulatto” wasn’t too terribly offensive to him, as he felt compelled to reuse it. Perhaps he picks up some Conrad novels before going off to insult folks.


      • on March 24, 2010 at 8:37 am cassandragoldman

        GM, thank you! Chivalry is not dead. I am grateful to you for coming to my defense.

        I expect he was, though I manage to cope with most of the upsets of my life, such as having medical care in my country socialized and the already likely doom of my beloved country made inevitable, without ordering strangers to sexually service a man of my choice and then die. As a matter of fact, a good friend of mine spent some time last night lecturing me that I should have used the term “bi-racial”, but I refuse to commit such a crime against the English language. Feigned concern over “racism” has already been used to deprive Europeans and Canadians of their freedom of speech and it will shortly be used here for the same purpose, so using a neutral descriptive term was my very tiny stand for that freedom while we still have it.

        I find it amusing but also disturbing that a published author who is published in the New York Times cannot summon any better a debate than to call me a name and wish for violence to be called down upon me. In addition, I looked at his blog and found that he has made snide remarks about those of us concerned about the future death panels. Someone should explain to him and Mr. Keillor that if they wish to convince anyone that socialized medicine will not be used as a political weapon, they would be wise to refrain from publicly stating that they wish for people who disagree with them to die.


  5. on March 24, 2010 at 7:45 am GM Palmer

    Dear Cassandra,

    I’m interested that you linked to the Alternative Right post which in turn linked to Roissy.

    I find him distasteful and, to use his own words, venal. His projections and posturing are at least as dangerous and destructive as feminism–far from being a rejection of progressive policies, he embraces and manipulates them to his own, unrestrained purposes.

    Along with that, whenever I hear the terms “alpha” and “beta,” I reach for my M/N 38.


    • on March 24, 2010 at 8:28 am cassandragoldman

      I’m not actually keen on either of those sites, but that particular post made a good enough point I couldn’t refrain from quoting.


  6. on March 24, 2010 at 9:10 am David Brown

    Cassandra,

    Conflicting science reporting confuses the public. The latest example involves a study in which it was concluded that increased omega-6 intake protects heart health. Here’s the study, a press release, and recommendations issued by an expert panel more than a year before the study was published:
    http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000252
    http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000252
    http://www.webmd.com/heart/news/20090126/expert-panel-omega-6-wont-hurt-heart

    Here is Stephen Guyenet’s analysis of the matter:
    http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/2010/03/leave-your-brain-at-door.html

    Here is a general analysis of how the various kinds of fat affect heart health:
    http://www.thepaleodiet.com/articles/Dietary%20Fat%20Quality%20%20CHD%20August%202009.pdf

    So there’s a 70% reduction of CHD events and mortality by decreasing omega-6 and an over all pooled risk reduction of 19% with increased intake of unspecified PUFAs. Which is the stronger evidence: the pooled results of the eight trials discussed above or the one long term n-6 LA reduction trial?


  7. on March 25, 2010 at 2:53 pm Proper English is a crime « A Letter To The Times

    [...] it a worthy use of his time to comment on my blog, which is read by a few dozen people. His comment in its entirety reads: I think you are perfect scum and the only thing that might help you is if [...]


  8. on March 28, 2010 at 1:49 pm Linkage is Good for You: Sloth Edition

    [...] Goldman – “How to Deal With the New Medical Care System“, “Proper English is a [...]


  9. on April 9, 2010 at 8:24 am Dean Ericson

    Hello Cassandra,
    I came across your blog just today and enjoyed reading. Then I came across the comment from “greg critser”. At first I was skeptical that it was actually from him, since he appeared to be a responsible adult professional and and cases of internet fraud are rife. But then a few clicks brought me to his blog where he was, incredibly, defending it. I commented there that if he had any honor or decency he would apologize. I wouldn’t hold my breath, however. His comment strikes me as emblematic of the moral and intellectual degeneracy, depravity even, of those under the influence of leftism.
    Kind regards,
    Dean Ericson

    (My comment left at Mr. Critser’s blog:)
    Dear Mr. Critser,
    I came across your comment on Cassandra Goldman’s blog, where you wrote,

    “I think you are perfect scum and the only thing that might help you is if you mated with a “mulatto.”
    Please die an early death.”

    At first I was skeptical the comment was genuine. Surely a man who was, apparently, an adult, a successful writer, and responsible member of society would not publicly post such a vile message? A few clicks later and here I am at your blog, where you defend it. I’m truly surprised. It is a nasty and vile thing to say, and not at all justified by anything Cassandra wrote. If you have any honor or decency you will apologize.
    Sincerely,
    Dean Ericson


    • on April 29, 2010 at 3:39 pm cassandragoldman

      Mr. Ericson,

      Thank you very much for defending me. I was also amazed that a professional author would behave in such a way.

      Cassandra Goldman


  10. on August 9, 2010 at 12:23 pm WGMOW

    Interesting blog. In my opinion, eating should not be a mystery, and getting to and staying at a healthy weight should not be a mystery either.

    A bit of my family history: my mother was an excellent cook. My father, mother, sister, and I were always lean, fit , and healthy. We ate a combination of eastern European foods and lots of red meat, whole milk, eggs, bacon, and lots of dairy products like sour cream, butter, cottage cheese, and even buttermilk. Bread was rye, whole wheat, corn-and-molasses, or home-made. We NEVER used corn syrup, artificial sweeteners, skim milk, or (ugh!) soy products.

    Breakfast was orange juice, cereal, and a glass of milk, or bacon and eggs. Lunch was a meat sandwich, piece of fruit, and a glass of milk. Dinner was meat, vegetables or salad, and a starch such as potatos, rice, or pasta and a glass of milk. No dessert except fruit or vegetables (and inexplicably, pickles), no snacks, no soda during the week. On weekends, maybe a coke and some popcorn or chips. We didn’t eat this way because we were poor. we ate this way because my mother had been a nurse and believed that three squares and portion control was the key to a healty diet. My familiy is living proof that she was correct.

    In today’s food world portion control is a dirty word: the average dinner is 30-50% bigger than it was just 20 year ago. Everybody walks around sucking on some kind a drink, like a baby sucking on a pacifier. Cola, energy drinks, giant coffees, or those gloppy, sickly-sweet concoctions made with chemicals and topped with whipped chemicals, and chemical frosting. Kids and workers must have snacks mid-morning and mid-afternoon to “keep their energy up.” Huh???

    I’m a scientist, and I know my diatribe is far from scientific, but it worked well, and still does. Now I have to excuse myself – time for my snack: a bowl of black bing cherries!



Comments are closed.

  • Archives

    • December 2011 (2)
    • July 2011 (1)
    • June 2011 (1)
    • May 2011 (1)
    • April 2011 (1)
    • March 2011 (5)
    • February 2011 (1)
    • December 2010 (3)
    • November 2010 (1)
    • October 2010 (3)
    • May 2010 (2)
    • March 2010 (4)
    • February 2010 (1)
    • January 2010 (2)
    • December 2009 (4)
    • November 2009 (2)
    • October 2009 (9)
    • August 2009 (1)
    • July 2009 (2)
    • June 2009 (6)
    • May 2009 (10)
    • March 2009 (7)
    • February 2009 (5)
    • January 2009 (6)
    • December 2008 (1)
    • November 2008 (2)
  • Categories

    • Bureaucracy (1)
    • Egalitarianism (4)
    • Frankfurt School (1)
    • Hegelian Dialectic (4)
    • Uncategorized (73)
  • Pages

    Blog at WordPress.com.

    Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Powered by WordPress.com