• Home

A Letter To The Times

"I shall write a letter to the Times!"

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Dames With Camellias
The jackals turn on their own »

Rape Prevention vs. Feminism

June 12, 2011 by Cassandra Goldman

Everybody is linking this today, rather gleefully, and frothing at the mouth about how terrible it is that some people advise women about how to minimize their chances of getting raped. I’ve been flamed by feminists before for denouncing their long-standing habit of urging women to put themselves in danger. But that today’s women need to be told “getting stinking drunk is unsafe” or “don’t go to crime-ridden neighborhoods in a miniskirt at 1 am”, let alone believe that they should be offended at having such commonsense measures pointed out to them, shows why today’s governments keep expanding the nanny state.

The absurdity of the item linked above is so complete that there is really no way to answer it. Are we supposed to listen seriously to people who imagine that violent people are going to listen to this kind of thing? That it is not more effective to advise prospective victims on how to safeguard themselves? Potential rapists have no interest in restraining themselves. Potential victims have a great deal.

In the interest of suggesting something more constructive than either set of advice above, I have wearily compiled a short list which, if followed, will cut rapes down to less than ten percent of what they are now. I absolutely guarantee it.

Feminists and liberals will oppose every measure below with all their might, because they do not care at all if women get raped.

1. Restore fatherhood. Virtually all violent crimes are committed by people who grew up in fatherless homes. So if we want to lower crime – which feminists do not – we will abolish no-fault divorce and default mother custody. Also we must deny unwed mothers welfare unless they surrender their children for adoption by a married couple.

2. Abolish co-education. Locking girls up with boys who have not yet been socialized guarantees that many of them will be sexually assaulted before they have even begun puberty. If feminists wanted girls to be safe from violence, they would have rioted until co-education was outlawed decades ago.

3. Have boys taught by men. Female teachers have demonstrated that they cannot stand up to a six-year-old with a penis. Really, this is as unfair to boys as it is to girls. When a boy spends his childhood and adolescence physically and sexually assaulting girls and getting not so much as an admonition from the authority figures in his life, small wonder that he imagines he can continue committing assault when he comes of age. When he finally chooses a victim who is not his classmate and not on a campus, he will probably be completely astonished to find himself arrested this time.

4. Abolish Third World immigration. Especially Muslim. Return most such immigrants who are already here back to wherever they came from. Liberals become enraged when this well documented fact is pointed out to them, but such immigrants commit crimes wildly out of proportion to their numbers. If Muslims in Europe were sent home, the rape rate over there would virtually vanish.

5. Restore cultural respect for chastity. Help women avoid foolishly putting themselves in danger to win the approval of irresponsible feminists by giving them societal support in taking care of themselves. Help spiritually weak men – the ones who commit nearly all crimes, and thus have always needed society’s help to control themselves – by not constantly provoking their animal side.

I wrote this out of frustration that friends of mine – intelligent women, who should have better sense – have been so indoctrinated that they think the nonsense I linked above deserves applause. But mostly, I feel incredibly weary that this is what is taking up people’s attention. The economy dissolving, crime and terrorism ever more rampant, and various social pathologies are destroying our civilization, and people are making a fuss about how terrible it is to give women advice that would make them a little bit safer from the hell progressives have created. The words “Rome” and “fiddle” come to mind.

EDIT: And just after I finished this, my dear Hypatia complained about coming across some idiot declaring that saying that someone has “a big fat mouth” is “fat-phobic”, and a commercial came on tv asserting that using the word “retarded” to disparage someone who does stupid things, like complain about women being advised not to put themselves in vulnerable positions, is just as bad as using nasty ethnic slurs. Fiddling indeed.

Advertisement

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

7 Responses

  1. on June 16, 2011 at 11:33 pm G.M. Palmer

    But these things impinge upon our *freedom* and as every Westerner knows *freedom* is the most important thing EVAR.


  2. on June 16, 2011 at 11:41 pm G.M. Palmer

    Interesting information here:

    http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_rap_percap-crime-rapes-per-capita


  3. on June 17, 2011 at 12:19 pm namae nanka

    “When he finally chooses a victim who is not his classmate and not on a campus, he will probably be completely astonished to find himself arrested this time.”

    You’re behind the times.


  4. on June 19, 2011 at 4:17 am Linkage is Good for You: Father’s Day Edition

    [...] Cassandra Goldman – “Rape Prevention vs. Feminism” [...]


  5. on July 10, 2011 at 12:23 pm Linkpost, 7/10/11 « Organicist

    [...] Letter to the Times – Rape Prevention vs. Feminism, What Planned Parenthood Does, The Dames With Camellias, Young Men: The Hope of the [...]


  6. on July 28, 2011 at 3:05 am Joseph

    This reminds me of the “rehabilitation” class that is offered to rapists in San Francisco. It is supposed to “teach” rapists to respect women. Therein, you can see how Leftists misunderstand vice. Wicked, vicious people are not theoretically ignorant. It’s not that they didn’t read the “don’t rape” memo. Rather, their will is perverse. Their practical reason has been corrupted through years of neglect and bad choices. An intervention on the intellectual level cannot help. Why this evades the Left is a mystery to me.


  7. on July 28, 2011 at 9:53 am Cassandra Goldman

    Joseph, that is it precisely. I waxed sarcastic about this a few years ago, listing the atrocities of Saddam Hussein and wondering if his henchmen had simply never been told that feeding people into industrial shredders was wrong.



Comments are closed.

  • Archives

    • December 2011 (2)
    • July 2011 (1)
    • June 2011 (1)
    • May 2011 (1)
    • April 2011 (1)
    • March 2011 (5)
    • February 2011 (1)
    • December 2010 (3)
    • November 2010 (1)
    • October 2010 (3)
    • May 2010 (2)
    • March 2010 (4)
    • February 2010 (1)
    • January 2010 (2)
    • December 2009 (4)
    • November 2009 (2)
    • October 2009 (9)
    • August 2009 (1)
    • July 2009 (2)
    • June 2009 (6)
    • May 2009 (10)
    • March 2009 (7)
    • February 2009 (5)
    • January 2009 (6)
    • December 2008 (1)
    • November 2008 (2)
  • Categories

    • Bureaucracy (1)
    • Egalitarianism (4)
    • Frankfurt School (1)
    • Hegelian Dialectic (4)
    • Uncategorized (73)
  • Pages

    Blog at WordPress.com.

    Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Powered by WordPress.com